NUR3001 Evidence Based Health Care 护理 assignment 代写

  • 100%原创包过,高质量代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信:273427
  • NUR3001 Evidence Based Health Care 护理 assignment 代写



    NUR3001 Evidence Based Health Care
    Assessment Task 1: Major Assignment – –
    Evidence to Support Clinical Practice
    Due: 5pm Monday,  24 th April , 2017  via Moodle
    Worth: 45 % of fina l grade
    Words: 2500 words –excluding in- text references and reference list
    This assignment requires you to complete a critical appraisal research report on one (1) of the following areas of
    clinical practice research:
    1.  Hand Hygiene. Please find the following four (4) research papers:
    Sendlhofer, G., Krause, R., Kober, B., Vander, K., Zierler, R., Brunner, G., Augustin, T., Stelzl, l., & Kamolz, L.P. (2015).
    Hand hygiene behaviour in a tertiary university hospital: differences between surgical and non-surgical
    departments. Safety in Health 1(10), DOI 10.1186/s40886-015-0002-5
    Battistella, G., Berto, G., & Bazzo, S. (2017). Developing professional habits of hand hygiene in intensive care settings:
    An action-research intervention. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 38, 53-59.
    Cohen, B., Murray, M., Haomiao, J., Jackson, O., Saiman, l. Neu, N., Hutcheon, G., & Larsen, E. (2016). Is hand hygiene
    frequency associated with the onset of outbreaks in pediatric long-term care? American Journal of Infection
    Control 44, 1492- 1494.
    Wiles, L., Roberts, C., Schmidt, K., & Beach, V. (2015). Keep it clean: A visual approach to reinforce hand hygiene
    compliance in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing 41(2), 119-124.
    2.  Medication A dministration. Please find the following four (4) research papers: :
    Olds, D.M. & Clarke, S.P. (2010). The effect of work hours on adverse events and errors in health care. Journal of
    Safety Research 41, 153-162.
    Orbæk, J., Gaard, M., Fabricius, P., Lefevre, R. & Moller, T. (2015). Patient safety and technology-driven medication -
    A qualitative study on how graduate nursing students navigate through complex medication administration.
    Nurse Education in Practice 15, 203-211.
    Drach-Zahavy, Somech, A., Admi, H., Peterfreund, I., & Peker, H. (2014). (How) do we learn from errors? A
    prospective study of the link between the ward’s learning practices and medication administration errors.
    International Journal of Nursing Studies 51, 448-457.
    Elliot, R.A., Le, C.K., Beanland, C., Vakil, K., & Goeman, D. (2016). Medicines management, medication errors and
    adverse medication events in older people referred to a community nursing service: A retrospective
    observational study. Drugs-Real World Outcomes, 3, 13-24.
    2
    Review Paper (2500 words)
    Critical Appraisal
    Using an appropriate critical appraisal tool, critique each of the four papers under the following headings:
    1. Introduction and background
    •  Identify the research question and a brief summary of the background. Is the research question clear? Is
    the need for the study justified?
    •  Write a PICOT or PICOT variation for each paper
    2. Style
    •  Briefly identify the study design and method, including the study population, and data collection method/s.
    Are the data collection methods consistent with the stated research aims?
    •  Have the researchers shown evidence of objectivity, is there evidence of minimisation of bias?
    •  Where does the study rank in the NHMRC/JBI levels of evidence?
    3. Results
    •  How the results are presented, are they clear and consistent with the research style? Can they be
    generalised and applied to clinical practice?
    4. Conclusions
    •  Have the authors discussed the results and drawn meaningful conclusions? Have the study limitations been
    acknowledged?
    5. Comment briefly on the author and journal credibility for each paper
    •  Choose only the first and last author and briefly cover expertise, affiliation, Scopus ranking, relevant
    disclosure of any conflict of interest. Locate the Journal ranking, what does this suggest about the clinical
    significance of the study?
    Your assignment is to be presented as a report, with each paper covered separately. You are not required to include
    an overall introduction and conclusion. It is recommended that you use headings and subheadings to structure your
    paper. You are required to cite all additional sources used to support your critique, including your choice of critical
    appraisal tool/s. Please refer to the attached rubric (page 3) for allocation of marks.
    Appropriate referencing must be used (using APA 6 th style)
    Include a title page with assignment details, topic, your student ID and actual word count. Please submit as a
    Word.doc
    Please ensure you submit your assignment (without the reference list) through Turnitin at least 48 hours before the
    due date to ensure you receive your report in time to make any necessary changes.
    3
    NUR3001 Assignment One Marking Rubric
    Assessment Criteria Total /90 marks  High Distinction
    (80-100%)
    Distinction
    (70-79%)
    Credit
    (60-69%)
    Pass
    (50-59%)
    Fail
    (<50%)
    Paper 1 (625 words, total 20 marks)
    1.  Introduction/Background/PICOT (5
    marks)
    2.  Style (5marks)
    3.  Results (4 marks)
    4.  Conclusion (3 marks)
    5.  Authors, Journal ranking (3 marks)
    Demonstrates excellent grasp
    of critique style under
    appropriate headings. PICOT,
    author& journal rank
    Demonstrates very good
    grasp of critique style
    under appropriate
    headings.
    PICOT, author& journal
    rank
    Demonstrates a good
    grasp of critique style
    under appropriate
    headings. PICOT, author,
    journal rank
    Demonstrates a fair
    grasp of critique style
    under appropriate
    headings. PICOT,
    author, journal rank
    Demonstrates a
    poor/incorrect or
    missing elements of
    critique. PICOT,
    author journal rank
    Paper 2. (625 words, total 20 marks)
    1.  Introduction/background/PICOT (5
    marks)
    2.  Style (5marks)
    3.  Results (4 marks)
    4.  Conclusion (3 marks)
    5.  Authors, Journal ranking (3 marks)
    Discussion demonstrates
    excellent grasp of critique
    under appropriate headings.
    PICOT, author& journal rank
    Discussion demonstrates
    very good grasp of
    critique under
    appropriate headings.
    PICOT, author& journal
    rank
    Discussion demonstrates
    a good grasp of critique
    under appropriate
    headings. PICOT, author,
    journal rank
    Discussion
    demonstrates a fair
    grasp of critique
    under appropriate
    headings, PICOT,
    author, journal rank
    Discussion
    demonstrates a
    poor/incorrect or
    missing elements of
    critique.
    PICOT, author journal
    rank
    Paper 3. (625 words, total 20 marks)
    1.  Introduction/background/PICOT (5
    marks)
    2.  Style (5marks)
    3.  Results (4 marks)
    4.  Conclusion (3 marks)
    5.  Authors, Journal ranking (3 marks)
    Discussion demonstrates
    excellent grasp of critique
    under appropriate headings.
    PICOT, author& journal rank
    Discussion demonstrates
    very good grasp of
    critique under
    appropriate headings.
    PICOT, author& journal
    rank
    Discussion demonstrates
    a good grasp of critique
    under appropriate
    headings, PICOT, author,
    journal rank
    Discussion
    demonstrates a fair
    grasp of critique
    under appropriate
    headings, PICOT,
    author, journal rank
    Discussion
    demonstrates a
    poor/incorrect or
    missing elements of
    critique,
    PICOT, author journal
    rank
    Paper 4. (625 words, total 20 marks)
    1.  Introduction/background/PICOT (5
    marks)
    2.  Style (5marks)
    3.  Results (4 marks)
    4.  Conclusion (3 marks)
    5.  Authors, Journal ranking (3 marks)
    Discussion demonstrates
    excellent grasp of critique
    under appropriate headings.
    PICOT, author& journal rank
    Discussion demonstrates
    very good grasp of
    critique under
    appropriate headings.
    PICOT, author& journal
    rank
    Discussion demonstrates
    a good grasp of critique
    under appropriate
    headings. PICOT, author,
    journal rank
    Discussion
    demonstrates a fair
    grasp of critique
    under appropriate
    headings, PICOT,
    author, journal rank
    Discussion
    demonstrates a
    poor/incorrect or
    missing elements of
    critique,
    PICOT, author journal
    rank
    Grammar, spelling, formatting (5marks)
    Citation/ Referencing format as per APA 6 th
    Edition format (5marks)
    Excellent expression, Polished
    presentation
    Accurate citing, consistent
    use of APA referencing style
    Very well expressed, few
    errors in grammar.
    Mostly accurate citing
    and consistent APA
    referencing style

    NUR3001 Evidence Based Health Care 护理 assignment 代写
    Well expressed, several
    errors in grammar &
    some inaccuracies in
    citing and APA
    referencing style
    Expression not fluent.
    Inconsistent citing
    and use of APA
    referencing format
    Very poor expression,
    meaning unclear.
    Unreferenced
    material, APA style
    inconsistent or absent
    NUR3001 Evidence Based Health Care 护理 assignment 代写