UNCC100: Self and Community Assignment 2 代写
Assignment 2
Your assessment is to:
Write an Op-Ed (opinion-editorial) piece that allows you to demonstrate an understanding of how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and the realization of the common good may be addressed by you in your professional practice now and in the future. You will need to select an issue that relates to the degree program you are studying and write a concise but persuasive opinion piece on an issue or problem relating to the dignity of the human person and the realisation of the common good that relates to your future professional practice.
Readings for this assessment:
The readings of the unit available to you via LEO and through any wider or further reading you wish to include. Please note that you are not required to read outside of the reading list in the unit in order to achieve a high distinction in this assessment task. Further, you should read the articles on LEO that explain more fully what an Op-Ed piece is before commencing this assessed task.
General Instructions:
• Create an evocative and engaging Op-Ed that applies insights from Assessment 1 (knowledge base) on an issue or problem relating to the dignity of the human person and the realisation of the common good that relates to your professional practice (ie the degree program you are studying). For example, how does your chosen profession treat its clients’ privacy and how does what you have learned about human dignity and human rights impact on that treatment?
• The Op-Ed should clearly explain to readers what the issue or problem is and how your understanding of the knowledge you have acquired in the unit addresses the issue or problem and relate to the discipline area you are studying in. Please note that you do not have to come up with the ‘definitive solution’ rather provide a well-argued view in order to move forward on the issue or problem.
• The Op-Ed is to be no more than 700 words long (papers which fall beyond 770 words will not be marked beyond this point). The idea is to express your thoughts clearly and concisely and make your argument as directly as you can – just like a journalist or writer. Do not assume that this assignment is easy given the word length. The challenge is to present a persuasive argument in a concise manner!
• Although Op-Ed’s do not usually require referencing, for this academic work, referencing is required. References do not count in the word limit. See referencing guidelines on the UNCC100 LEO page (You can find it under Assessment>How do I reference course materials for UNCC units?).
• This assessment will be worth 50 marks.
Due date:
Weighting:
Length and/or format:
Learning outcomes assessed: How to submit:
Return of assignment: Page 8 of 12
Tuesday 24th October (4am) 50%
700 words long. Papers that are greater than 770 words will not be marked beyond this point.
2
The Op-Ed piece must be uploaded to LEO via Turnitin.
Assignments will be returned via LEO when final grades are released. If you are unsure how to find your assignment results and
Assessment criteria:
feedback you can read how to do this on LEO under Assessment > How to find your results and feedback.
The following table lists the criteria you will be marked on and the standard for each criterion required to achieve each grade for Assignment 2.
HD 85-100
Di 75-84
Cr 65-74
Pa 50-64
NN 0-49
Analysis and Evaluation
(40 marks)
HD = 34-40 marks
DI = 30-33.5 marks
Cr = 26-29.5 marks
Pa = 20-25.5 marks
NN = 0-19.5 marks
Provides a highly distinctive analysis and evaluation showing how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and realization of the common good may be addressed by the student in their professional practice (i.e. degree program) now and in the future.
Demonstrated deep engagement with module materials.
Provides a distinctive analysis and evaluation showing how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and realization of the common good may be addressed by the student in their professional practice (i.e. degree program) now and in the future.
Shows distinct evidence of engagement with a range of module materials.
Provides a creditable analysis and evaluation showing how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and realization of the common good may be addressed by the student in their professional practice (i.e. degree program) now and in the future.
Shows evidence of engagement with the module materials beyond the level of class discussion.
Provides a satisfactory analysis and evaluation showing how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and realization of the common good may be addressed by the student in their professional practice (i.e. degree program) now and in the future.
Fails to provide a satisfactory analysis and evaluation to show how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and realization of the common good may be addressed by the student in their professional practice (i.e. degree program) now and in the future.
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Style and Writing Mechanics (5 marks)
Satisfactory = 2.5-5 marks Unsatisfactory = 0-2 marks
Presents all information in a highly distinctive and engaging style.
Few errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Presents information in an unsatisfactory style.
Many errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling.
Referencing
(5 marks)
Satisfactory = 2.5-5 marks Unsatisfactory = 0-2 marks
Accurately cites all sources of information to support the credibility and authority of the information presented.
Not all sources are cited accurately.
Does not provide sufficient information about sources used.
Page 9 of 12
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL ASSESSMENTS IN THIS UNIT
Referencing:
This unit requires you to use the referencing system used by your discipline area.
See the Academic Referencing Skills page from the Academic Skills Unit for more details.
ACU Policies and Regulations:
It is your responsibility to read and familiarise yourself with ACU policies and regulations, including regulations on examinations; review and appeals; acceptable use of IT facilities; and conduct and responsibilities. These are in the ACU Handbook, which is available from the website.
Assessment Policy and Procedures:
You must read the Assessment Policy and Assessment Procedures in the University Handbook: they include rules on deadlines; penalties for late submission; extensions; and special consideration. If you have any queries on Assessment Policy, please see your Lecturer in Charge.
Academic integrity:
You have the responsibility to submit only work which is your own, or which properly acknowledges the thoughts, ideas, findings and/or work of others. The Framework for Academic Integrity and the Academic Honesty Policy are available from the website. Please read them, and note in particular that plagiarism, collusion and recycling of assignments are not acceptable. Penalties for academic dishonesty can vary in severity, and can include being excluded from the course.
Turnitin:
The ‘Turnitin’ application (a text-matching tool) will be used in this unit, in order to enable:
• students to improve their academic writing by identifying possible areas of poor citation and referencing in their written work; and
• teaching staff to identify areas of possible plagiarism in students’ written work.
Further instruction on how to submit your assignments via Turnitin will be provided prior to submission of
your first assignment.
While Turnitin can help in identifying problems with plagiarism, avoiding plagiarism is more important.
Information on is available from the Academic Skills Unit web page.
For any assignment that has been created to allow submission through Turnitin (check the Assignment submission details for each assessment task), you should submit your draft well in advance of the due date (ideally, several days before) to ensure that you have time to work on any issues identified by Turnitin. On the assignment due date, lecturers will have access to your final submission, and the Turnitin Originality Report.
UNCC100: Self and Community Assignment 2 代写
Dear UNCC100 students
This is a reminder in relation to your final assessment (assessment 2) for UNCC100 this semester. Your assessment must address an “ issue or problem relating to the dignity of the human person and the realisation of the common good that relates to your professional practice (i.e. the degree program you are studying)”; “how your understanding of the knowledge you have acquired in the unit addresses the issue or problem and relates to the discipline area you are studying in”(UNCC100 Unit Outline p.8).
If you have any questions in relation to your assessment, please raise these with your tutor as soon as possible.
Please be aware that Assessment Task 2 for UNCC100 is due in LEO at 4:00AM (in the morning, NOT the evening).
Unless you have an approved extension or special consideration, late applications will be penalized.
UNCC100: Self and Community Assignment 2 代写
