代写 MMM132/MMMP132 management 迪肯 assignment
DEAKIN COLLEGE
MMM132/MMMP132 REPORT FORMAT LAYOUT
ASSIGNMENT 1Part B (2, 2016)
These guide notes are provided to assist you with your writing and presentation of assignment 1 Part B. Please remember to consult with your lecturer about ANY questions you have about the assignment and/or information provided to you here.
Please remember your report must focus on one of the following organisations:
· Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)
· Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Limited (DPE)
RESEARCH REPORT LAYOUT :
Title / Cover page
· Not included in word count
· Provide title of report, name and website of organisation, unit code and unit name, student name and ID, class number, your tutor name, the date the report was completed
· No page number on Title/Cover page
Executive Summary (approximately 200 words)
· Included in word count
· Provide summary of the complete report including:
o stating purpose (what is the purpose of the report)
o how information was investigated (company information, website, academic articles)
o what you found, and what your findings mean (for example, you investigated the mission of the organisation, what did you find? Did you find the mission closely links to theory/articles about what constitutes a mission/vision statement …?)
o Provide a page number. Use i as page number as this page precedes Table of Contents. Page number using 1, 2 etc begins on introduction page.
Table of Contents
· Not included in word count
· Show sections and sub-sections that FOLLOW this page and page numbers for each section
· Do not provide a page number for this page
· Do not include title page, or Executive Summary in this section as both precede the Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction(approximately 100 words)
· Included in word count
|
Business Report Format (Adapted from http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support/academic-resources/report-writing) |
|
|
Title page (notincluded in theword count) |
· Titleof report - should clearlydescribewhatthe reportisabout · Nameandwebsiteoforganisation · Studentnameand IDnumber · Unitcodeand unitname |
| Executivesummary | Thisis a summary ofthewholereport.Outlinethetask,explaintheresearchprocessused,whatyoufound,and whatyour findingsmean intermsofyourown preferences(approx.200 words). |
|
Table ofcontents (notincluded in theword count) |
Listthe majorandminorsectionsofyourreport. Remember to use appropriate headings per section, do NOT use the question as a heading, or use the word ‘Body’ |
| Introduction | Setthescene;givesomebackground information aboutthereport/organisation;statetheaim/purposeof theinvestigation.Provideanoutlineof the main sectionsin thebody ofthereport(approx.100 words). |
| Body | Organise the body of the report into sections with clear headings for each of the five report requirements. The analysis of each question 1 to 5 (page 1) should identify the theory relating to what you investigated, what you found about the organisation, your interpretationand critical analyses of what you found, with correctly cited evidence drawn from appropriate academic textbook and journal sources. Remember to include at least one academic journal for each of the five sections. Each section should be answered in approximately200 -500 words, up to a total of2000 words for this whole section of the report. See the marking rubric for allocation of marks for each section. |
| Conclusion | Summarisewhathasbeenachievedin thereport.Use theinformation fromthebody of yourreporttoidentifytheanticipated futuredirectionof theorganisation in lightof theenvironmentsdiscussed inthebody of thereport,and the‘match’betweenyou and thatorganisation ina graduaterole(approx.200 words). |
| Recommendations | NOTrequired inthisassignment. |
|
References (notincluded in theword count) |
A listof allof thein-textsourcesthatyou cited in the reportusing theDeakinHarvard referencing style: http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support/referencing/harvard |
|
Appendices[optional] (not included in the word count) |
Anyinformation (graphs,charts,tables orotherdata)you used in yourreportbutdid notincludein thebody. |
MMM132 Assignment Marking Rubric: Report (30% - 30 marks) |
||||||
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS |
YET TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM STANDARD |
MEETS STANDARD |
EXCEEDS STANDARD |
|||
No/poor attempt |
Needs improvement |
Satisfactory |
Good |
Very good |
Excellent |
|
Report structure, organisation and logical flow, including Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Introduction and ConclusionULO2(Max 5marks) |
0.5Poor attempt.0-1.25 |
2Does not follow the required report structure/format.Report is disjointed and fragmented. 1.26-2.25 |
2.75An attempt is made to follow the required report structure/format.Report lacks flow and is somewhat disjointed and fragmented.2.3-3 |
3.5A good attempt is made to follow the required report structure/format.Report flows quite well, but is disjointed or fragmented in some places. 3.1-3.75 |
4A very good attempt is made to follow the required report structure/format.Report has a logical flow. 3.76-4.25 |
5Excellent use of the required report structure/format.Report has a logical flow and coherent line of argument. 4.26-5 |
Description and analysis of Q1 relevant to the organisation.ULO1(Max 2 marks) |
0.1The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.0-0.2 |
0.3The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to an appropriate journal article. Some context is provided but may be unclear.0.25-0.4 |
1The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are described without ambiguityand refers to a suitable journal article,but is not discussed. Some context provided.0.41-1.0 |
1.2The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are clearly identified,has reference to a suitable journal article that is somewhat explained, is without ambiguity and in context.1.1-1.25 |
1.5The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this questionare clearly identified and described well, with relevant information,suitable journal article(s), and argument where necessary for understanding. The context and the background are explained.1.26-1.75 |
2The fundamental theories and practice relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, suitable journal article(s) are used, deliver all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and the background are well explained.1.76-2 |
Description and analysis of Q2 relevant to the organisation.ULOs 1 & 3(Max 5 marks)) |
0.5The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question arenot clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.Paraphrases or summarises information rather than providing an analysis. Does not identify components of the theory, does not distinguish the relevant from irrelevant details. 0-1.25 |
1.75The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article.Some context is provided but may be unclear.Paraphrases or summarises information with very little analysis. Inconsistently identifies components of the theories and incorrectly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details 1.26-2.25 |
2.75The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.Some context provided. Demonstrates the ability to analyse information to a rudimentary level. Identifies components of the theories, mostly distinguishing relevant from irrelevant details. 2.3-3 |
3.5The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguityand in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.A fair analysis of information, clearly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details. 3.1-3.75 |
4The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal article(s) are used.A robust analysis of information consistently identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details. 3.76-4.25 |
5The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained and suitable journal article(s) are used.A thorough analysis of information, thoroughly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately and thoroughly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details. 4.26-5 |
Description and analysis of Q3 relevant to the organisationULOs 1 & 3(Max 5 marks) |
0.5The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.Paraphrases or summarises information rather than providing an analysis. Does not identify components of the theory, and does not distinguish the relevant from irrelevant details. 0-1.25 |
1.75The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article. Some context is provided but may be unclear.Paraphrases or summarises information with very little analysis. Inconsistently identifies components of the theories and incorrectly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.1.26-2.25 |
2.75The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.Some context provided. Demonstrates the ability to analysis information to a rudimentary level.Identifies components of the theories; mostly distinguishing relevant from irrelevant details.2-3.3 |
3.5The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguity and in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.A fair analysis of information, clearly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details.3.1-3.75 |
4The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal article(s) are used.A robust analysis of information, consistently identifying the key components of the theories and accurately distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details. 3.76-4.25 |
5The fundamental theories and analysis relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained suitable journal article(s) are usedA thorough analysis of information, thoroughly identifying the key components of the theories and accurately and thoroughly distinguishes relevant from irrelevant details. 4.26-5 |
Description and evaluation of Q4 relevant to the organisationULOs 1 & 3(Max 5 marks) |
0.5The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.No evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice or discussion of relevant theory.0-1.25 |
1.75The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article. Some context is provided but may be unclear.Limited evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice or discussion of relevant theory provided.1.26-2.25 |
2.75The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.Some context provided.Satisfactory evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and some discussion of relevant theory.2.3-3 |
3.5The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguity and in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.Accurate evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and detailed discussion of relevant theory.3.1-3.75 |
4The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal article(s) are used.Robust evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and comprehensive discussion of relevant theory. 3.76-4.25 |
5The fundamental theories and evaluation relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained.Thorough evaluation of the appropriateness of the practice and excellent discussion of relevant theory.4.26-5 |
Description and evaluation of Q5 relevant to the organisationULOs 1 & 3(Max 5 marks) |
0.5The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are not clearly applied to the organisation chosen. The context may not be provided or may be very unclear.Reflection does not demonstrate clear reasoning and does not provide discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation0-1.25 |
1.75The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question may be slightly unclear or may not refer to appropriate journal article. . Some context is provided but may be unclear.Reflection demonstrates minimal clear reasoning and provides very basic discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.1.26-2.25 |
2.75The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are provided without ambiguity and refer to suitable journal article.Some context provided. Reflection demonstrates satisfactory clear reasoning and provides reasonable discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.2.3-3 |
3.5The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are clearly identified and explained, without ambiguity and in context and with reference to a suitable journal article.Reflection demonstrates clearand consistent reasoning and provides detailed discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.3.1-3.75 |
4The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are clearly identified and described well, with relevant information and argument where necessary for understanding. The context is clear and suitable journal article(s) are used.Reflection demonstrates clear, consistent and detailed reasoning and provides high-level discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation. 3.76-4.25 |
5The fundamental theories and reflection relevant to this question are clearly identified and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. The context and background are well explained.Reflection demonstratesconsistentand systematic reasoning and provides thorough discussion on the “cultural fit” to the organisation.4.26-5 |
Quality of language and ability to communicate information accurately using academic style(Max 3 marks) |
0.4Writing filled with grammatical and spelling errors. English expression is difficult to understand. Little or no use of paraphrasing, with a heavy reliance on quotes. In-text citations and referencing have not been used or do not conform to Harvard standard0-0.8 |
1.2Many grammatical and spelling errors. English expression is difficult to understand, but meaning can be made of what is written.Little effort has been put into paraphrasing of material. In-text citations not utilised or inaccurate. List of references does not follow the Harvard referencing style correctly. 0.9-1.4 |
1.6Expresses thoughts meaningfully, even though there may be occasional errors.Paraphrasing uses too many of the author’s own words. In-text citations are too sparse and/or mostly inaccurate. Some attempt to present a list of References following the Harvard referencing style, but may have several errors. 1.5-1.7 |
1.9Expresses thoughts meaningfully, even though there may be occasional errors.Paraphrasing portrays the ideas of others in student’s own words. In-text citations are accurate in most cases and are just adequate to the task. List of References presented using the Harvard referencing style accurately in most cases. 1.8-2 |
2.2Communicates meaning with clarity and fluency. Writing is almost error-free.Paraphrasing correctly portrays the ideas of others in student’s own words. In-text citations are accurate and support the arguments made in the assignment quite well. List of References presented accurately using the Harvard referencing style. 2.1-2.3 |
3Skilfully communicates meaning with high level of clarity and fluency. Writing is virtually error-free.Paraphrasing correctly portrays the ideas of others in student’s own words. In-text citations are accurate and support the arguments made in the assignment very well. List of References presented very accurately using the Harvard style. 2.4-3 |
