代写 ACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE

  • 100%原创包过,高质量代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信:273427
  • 代写 ACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE 
    ACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN AND PLANNING
    Thermal Comfort Experiment
    In recent history the practice of utilising air movement through natural ventilation or personal fans to improve occupant satisfaction in warm temperatures has been overshadowed by energy-intensive HVAC systems employed to condition the indoor environments of hermetically sealed buildings. This reliance on compressor-based cooling can be partly attributed to the empirical assessments of air movement and thermal comfort by Fanger (1970), and later the development of the draft risk model by Fanger & Christensen (1986), being enshrined in dominant international standards such as ASHRAE Standard 55 and ISO 7730 for decades.
    Thermal comfort standards practically preclude air movement as a means of achieving occupant comfort in centrally-conditioned buildings due to the potential for air movement to be negatively perceived as draft. In the years following the excellent contribution of Fanger and colleagues, however, there has been a general refocus of research attention away from the negative effects of draft (defined as unwanted cooling), towards the positive benefits of air movement. It is now recognised that the perceptual process of classifying air movement as a draft or breeze is more than just a heat-balance assessment.
    This lab session will look at the perceptual effects of air movement on thermal sensation and pleasure in different ambient temperatures. This ties in with the aim of the unit to provide students with a solid grounding in the principles and practice of instrumental and questionnaire measurement approaches in laboratory settings using state-of-the-art instrumentation.
    Methods:
    Both chambers of the IEQ Lab will be used, with participants divided into two groups of 12. Participants will experience a warm exposure and a cool exposure, each with two (2) air movement patterns: constant and sinusoidal. Participants will spend 30-minutes seated in the ambient conditions - ranging from 26-28°C in the warm exposure and 21-23°C in the cool exposure - before experiencing each air movement profile for 10-minutes in a randomised sequence. Participants will then swap rooms and undergo the same procedure, giving a total experiment duration of 100-minutes.
    4
    FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN AND PLANNING
    Instruments:
    Air temperature will be measured at 0.1m, 0.6m and 1.1m above floor in compliance with the measurement protocols in international standards. Relative humidity and globe temperature will be monitored in the occupied zone the chamber. All sensors will be logged continuously by the IEQ Lab Building Monitoring and Control System (BMCS).
    Low-powered personal fans will create air movement at the back of each subject’s neck and at ankle height, and a programmable switched-mode power supply will be used to regulate the voltage supplied to the fans to create the different air movement profiles.
    Fast-response omnidirectional Dantec anemometers will measure local back-of-the-neck air speed at a rate of 2Hz (2 times a second) in order to properly characterise airflow patterns.
    5
    FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN AND PLANNING
    A simple questionnaire consisting of three Likert scales for thermal sensation (7-point), local thermal sensation (7-point), thermal pleasure (7-point) and air movement preference (7-point) will be administered on paper.
    Recommended Reading:
    de Dear, R. J. (2011). Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: alliesthesia. Building Research & Information, 39(2), 108–117.
    Tanabe, S & Kimura, K. (1994). "Effects of air temperature, humidity, and air movement on thermal comfort under hot and humid conditions." ASHRAE transactions,100.2, 953-969.
    Zhou, X., Ouyang, Q., Lin, G., & Zhu, Y. (2006). Impact of dynamic airflow on human thermal response. Indoor Air, 16(5), 348–355.
    6
    FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, DESIGN AND PLANNING
    Assessment of Your Experiment Assignment (40%)
    Staff will collate and quality-assure results from each of the three experiments, placing them in a spreadsheet and then uploading same to the DESC9201 elearning website. Students can select whichever experiment they want to form the basis of their individual assignment (40%). The assignment is in the form of a 7-page manuscript ready for submission to the Architectural Science
    Review. See ‘Style Guidelines’ here… http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tasr&page=instructions
    - .UfSyX2Tbq50 The one exception to this style guideline is that students should embed their figures and tables within the text. The submission should include the following:
     abstract
     some background text,
     statement of the research question,
     review of the literature,
     description of research methods,
     presentation of research results,
     discussion of the results in relation to the key issues identified in the literature review
     conclusions,
     acknowledgments,
     reference list.
    Assessment Feedback Sheet
    criteria
    Poor
    Average
    Good
    Very Good
    Excellent
    1
    Coverage and understanding of the relevant
    research literature
    2
    Clarity in the statement of the research
    question
    3
    Articulates significance of research question
    4
    Methods: Concise yet complete enough to
    enable replication by other researchers.
    Results:
    Tables: Must include caption,
    column/headings, appropriate precision,
    5代写 ACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE 
    connection to the narrative in the text,
    Figures (diagrams/graphs): Must include
    captions, units, legends, something in the
    text that links the graph to the narrative.
    Effectively designed graph
    Discussion
    6
    Interpretation of data, connection to the
    literature, recognition of limitations of
    experiment, suggestions for future research,
    implications for design of built environments,
    7
    Conclusions:
    Conclusions based on results in context of
    literature, succinct
    8
    References (in Arch Science Review format).
    Stylistics: Overall quality of presentation,
    9
    writing style, adherence to Arch Sci Rev style,
    page limit of 7 pages (incl. figs, tables, refs,
    abstract 250words – check with Style Guide)
    代写 ACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE